Saturday, January 23, 2010

ASL Frequently Asked Questions

When I tell people that I know ASL, there's alway that first round of questions, which I'm happy to answer, but so I don't repeat myself a million times online, here ya go!

  • What does ASL stand for? No, it's not Age-Sex-Location. It stand for American Sign Language.
  • Is ASL a real language? Yes! For centuries ASL has been considered just pantomime, gesturing, or "monkey speak". The common assumption was that reason could only be attained through spoken language, thus sign language was sub-human or irrational. Only recently have linguists given serious consideration to the form, which has it's own system of grammar, syntax, and etymology and is shared among a community.
  • Is ASL a universal language? No. Each country has their own sign language. There is an international sign language called Gestuno. It's used sometimes by the World Federation of the Deaf and at the Deaflympics. It uses many signs that are common to several sign languages, but it is such a simple and limited language that it's impractical to use it all the time.
  • Is ASL derived from English? No. ASL is NOT signed English. It's origins lie with French Sign Language, learned from early teachers for the deaf, and some native signs that developed in the vineyard country in California, which had a large Deaf population. ASL does draw on English, but the syntax is completely different. There is Signed Exact English, which follows the same grammar structure as English and includes specific words not found in ASL, such as articles "a", "an", and "the". However, SEE is rarely used among the Deaf. ASL and SEE can be combined into a Pidgin Signed English, which is the style most hearing people sign when learning ASL for the first time.
  • Is ASL a foreign language? Yes. Most people associate the word "foreign" with outside the country, but "foreign" is anything that is not familiar to you. So unless you already know ASL, it is foreign to you. Many high schools and colleges accept ASL as a foreign language that can be taken for credit. WKU currently offers ASL 1 and 2 for credit.
  • Is there a written form of ASL? No. And personally, I don't see how there could be an effective written version of ASL. The language is based on space and movement, which is near impossible to capture on paper. Just ask anyone trying to learn new signs from an ASL book. Does that mean ASL cannot spread ideas past face-to-face interaction? Certainly not. Video is the best way to capture ASL and it be understandable. With technology advancing, ASL has a much better chance of spreading than in the past. In fact, when magazines are able to mass produce digital pages that can play video, I think the Deaf community will enjoy a surge in publications.
  • Why do people make such weird faces when they sign? If you've ever seen a conversation is ASL, it is very animated. This is for two reasons: one, because raising and furrowing one's eyebrows are central to ASL grammar and two, because facial expressions adds meaning and emotion to signs. People don't talk in a monotone, so it goes that they also don't sign without facial expression.
  • Are there "accents" is ASL like in spoken languages? Yes. Different regions develop their own native signs and sometimes a style of signing. Kind of like people on the east coast speak differently from the west, the north from the south, etc. The most notable accent in ASL is a "hearing accent". Hearing people tend to sign slower, less smoothly, and move their lips. Unless a hearing person is a native signer, they will almost always have this accent.
Hope that clears some things up. If you have more questions, post them in the comments. I plan on doing a follow up post for more in depth questions or ones I missed.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

WKU Center for the Study of Capitalism

I recently sent this to Brian Strow, the professor in charge of the new BB&T sponsored Center for the Study of Capitalism at Western Kentucky University:

I was thrilled to hear that BB&T is sponsoring WKU for a center to study capitalism. I'm a firm believer that capitalism is the most effective and only moral economic system because of it's regard for individual rights and condemnation of government interference. I'm very interested in helping out the center, and I hope you will let me know if there is ever a need for volunteers.

In the future, I would suggest inviting a speaker from the Ayn Rand Institute. I attended the debate on capitalism last semester and was disappointed by the pro-capitalism debaters. I don't think either one made a complete argument for the moral foundations of capitalism or effectively explained why those principles are so fundamental to capitalism's success. And I was dismayed at their inability to refute even the most inane questions. It just wasn't a true defense. I've heard lectures by many speakers from ARI, and I think students (especially business majors) could benefit from their pointed and specific arguments for capitalism. John Allison himself works closely with the Ayn Rand Institute. Some suggestions are:
I think organizing an open lecture with any one of these speakers would be an excellent way to promote rational discussion about capitalism, generate more knowledge about the center, and to present a clear cut defense of individual freedom in markets I think this campus has yet to see. I would be more than happy to help coordinate an event if a speaker were requested.


Looking forward to the center's future,

Miranda Barzey

Hopefully he takes me up on the suggestion!

Sunday, January 17, 2010

John Stossel on Ayn Rand

John Stossel aired a special on Atlas Shrugged last week on the Fox News Network. It featured advocates of Objectivism including Yaron Brook, John Allison, and Bradley Thompson and a libertarian guest, Nick Gillespie. It touched on the books popularity, its similarities to politics today, and some of its themes.

Overall I though the show was a success. It was great PR for Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, and Objectivism. I think it hit upon some good points in the novel without going past an average person's understanding of philosophy and politics. None of the guest were rushed to speak (though John Allison was talking pretty quick at the beginning) and the opinions were concise and clear. Stossel did take some opposing viewpoints from people in the crowd, but he did not have an equal amount of dissenters on stage to rebuff the Objectivists. It was a smart choice because it allowed the focus to be on Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand, rather than letting it dissolve into a heated back and forth argument where little is heard and nothing is accomplished. The opponents didn't deserve equal time because frankly, they had nothing to say. There was not a legitimate argument from any dissenters, only ad hominems and misunderstandings about the book and the philosophy. I think Brook, Allison, and Thompson did an excellent job of addressing each comment with a calm, brief reply that left no room for confusion.

I also think Allison did a great job of demonstrating how win-win relationships without sacrifice or predation helps businesses grow, which is in contrast to the stereotype that corporations only succeed in taking advantage of people. "We won't ever consciously do something that's bad for our clients. In fact, we believe that if we do the right things for our clients, in the long term, we'll be more successful." I wish he had made the reasons why BB&T took TARP money a bit more clear, but the confusion stemmed more from my lack of economics knowledge than his explanation. I'm really glad he mentioned that education needed "10,000 experiments, 9,990 of which fail" just like business. The idea of competition in education (not just secondary) needs to be promoted more. If education is ever going to get better in this country, it needs to be entirely private so that the best teaching methods win out over bad ones. With the government involved, public education is just a "monolith" that never improves because there is no competition.

And the segment on the growing nanny state was accessible to anybody with a brain. The government is getting involved with fish pedicures? During this part of the show my mom yelled out, "This is what I'm paying my government to do?" It put in very simple terms just how absurd the government is in "protecting" citizens.

But don't take my word for it. Watch it yourself:







Related Posts with Thumbnails